By Rachael
![]() |
| Photo via disneylandpostcards.com. |
Somehow,
princess stuff finds its way into our house. My 4-year-old has Little Mermaid
and Sleeping Beauty dress-up outfits, Little Mermaid and Cinderella purses, princess
books, a princess sleeping bag, and a plastic Cinderella play set complete with
a doll-sized carriage and horses.
I did not
purchase these items.
Before Megan
was born, my husband and I vowed to abstain from princess propaganda. Still, kindhearted
friends and relatives gave our daughter gifts, and strangers occasionally gave
her stuff for free when we went to garage sales, because she’s just so cute, of
course. So Megan owns a few princess items, but we don’t actively encourage her
interest.
We don’t hate
princesses. We actually love Disney animated movies. Beauty and the Beast is
one of my favorites, particularly because it doesn’t promote the unrealistic
notion of love at first sight. Back during my high school theatre days, my
dream was to don one of Belle’s golden gowns and work as a cast member at
Disney World. If I couldn’t be Belle, I’d settle for Cinderella.
So what do we
have against princesses? Half of the trouble is the narcissistic and
appearance-obsessed messages that lurk beneath the pink tulle. The other half
of the problem is unrestrained marketing. About a decade ago, Disney executives
bundled all their leading fairy tale ladies like Snow White and Belle into one
enormous marketing exploit, and it’s now impossible to avoid princesses.
They’re on clothing, bedspreads, shampoo bottles, pull-ups, crayons, vitamins,
bandages, everything. Disney princesses have become synonymous with girlhood, with few
other choices for preschool girls in the toy aisles, and all that pastel fluff
provides a very limited view of girlhood.
Some moms
love princesses and insist they’re a harmless phase young girls pass through.
Others, like me, are wary. Parental opinions differ enough that the Christian
Science Monitor suggests the “princess wars” may be the new
mommy wars.
The case
against hyper-feminine, heavily marketed princesses is compelling. The
Christian Science Monitor questions whether it’s the first step down a path
toward early
sexualization. The Wall Street
Journal ran an article a few years ago about self-absorption
and the princess culture. It states that research indicates young women
raised in a culture of lavish expectation have difficulty dealing with
professors, employers, and spouses who don’t cater to every whim. A Rutgers
article also questions whether the princess industry is somehow tied to the
rising popularity of extravagant
weddings, proms, and children’s birthday parties.
Princess
culture doesn’t necessarily end when preschoolers grow out of their infatuation
with Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella. Rather than dressing in sweet pink gowns,
older girls want to look “hot,” which equates to wearing skimpy shirts that say
“Spoiled Princess” or “Diva.” Girls often aspire to be pop stars, the ultimate
in divahood.
One of my
favorite books that addresses these concerns is Peggy Orenstein’s Cinderella
Ate My Daughter. She researches how the Disney princess industry came to
be, and she looks into other trends ranging from Bratz to American Girl, to
children’s beauty pageants, to spa and cosmetic industries targeting young
girls, to Disney’s infamous running list of wholesome starlets turned not so
wholesome. (Think Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus, and so on.)
Orenstein worries
about what princess marketing may be doing to girls. Obviously, there’s the
focus on appearance. Princesses may say that inner beauty matters, but they
still send the message that physical appearance is important. Megan and I
recently watched a Disney princess sing-along DVD from the library in which
Cinderella says, “It’s important to look your best, but it’s what’s on the
inside that counts.”
So which is
it?
Even when I
ask my daughter why she likes princesses, the first answer she gives is,
“Because they’re pretty.” We have since discussed how most of the princesses
are also kind (with the exception of The Little Mermaid, who talks back to and
disobeys her father and, in one scene, tells her friends to, “Just go away.”).
Now, Megan will provide a scripted answer when asked about her attraction to
princesses. “They’re pretty, and they’re kind,” she says.
I also wonder
whether princesses limit imaginative play. Megan often reenacts the same scenes
from The Little Mermaid, following the rote script rather than branching out
and creating her own story. When princesses are marketed heavily to little
girls, with few other choices among toys (or toothbrushes, or umbrellas, or
underwear, or fruit snacks …), it leaves a hole in an important aspect of child
development. Also consider how monochrome, er, pink, girlhood has become. Do
girls believe other good imaginative toys like Legos are off limits if they
aren’t pink?
What to do?
Orenstein
suggests a few ways to
celebrate girlhood without all the hyper-feminine bling, including throwing
some gender neutral toys into the mix, playing sports, and playing outdoors.
It’s also
worth delving into some non-Disneyified fairy tales. Megan and I recently
enjoyed reading an illustrated version of Hansel and Gretel. The children are
resourceful and solve their own problems, and of course princesses are nowhere
to be found. There’s also the classic alternative-princess story The
Paper Bag Princess, in which a dragon destroys the princess’ castle and
clothes, and she wears a paper bag while rescuing the prince. There are also plenty
of good stories that don’t involve princesses at all. Start with the picture book series based on
the Little
House on the Prairie books, the Madeline
series, or the Ramona
series.
In our house,
we obviously have not enforced a complete ban on princesses. I broke down this
past summer and bought two small cases of Polly Pocket princess dolls and dresses
for 50 cents each at a garage sale. Megan was excited because a Prince Eric
doll from The Little Mermaid was nestled among all the rubber outfits. To
Megan’s credit, Eric is one of her favorite characters. She likes how Ariel
rescues him from drowning, so I suppose feminists everywhere would be pleased.
What we do
emphasize is moderation. A bit of pink princess play is fine. Megan is even
looking forward to wearing a princess costume for Halloween this year. Yet, as
she grows up, I want her to know femininity is about more than glitz, gowns,
and commercial products.
You can
contact Rachael by e-mailing her at Rachael@mumblingmommy.com.
Other posts
you may like:




5 comments:
Rachel,
I love this article. I don't have a daughter, but I have some of the same concerns that you do. I'm also amazed at the mothers who are promoting boyfriend/girlfriend talk within my son's 1st grade class and talk about who's "cute." Some of them ask their girls "who do you like?" Why can't we just let them be kids?
Great article, Rachael, and even though I'm not raising girls, I do worry about the generation of "princesses." You would enjoy "The Ordinary Princess" by M.M. Kaye. It's about a princess given the "gift" of plain looks, so she has to rely on her character and intelligence. And yes, she lives happily ever after.
Anonymous: And then those moms lament about how their daughters are growing up so fast. Sigh.
Will have to check out that book, Beth!
We have two girls "princess age" -- the older one shows interest, and the younger one dislikes everything princess-related, preferring to play with anything her older brother has. Like you, we have never purchased anything "princess" but our house is full of the stuff. We don't ban it - but don't encourage it either. I will say that non-Disney entities seem to be promoting stronger, less-frilly princesses in recent years, so maybe that is a trend that will continue.
Katie, I think I've heard that Disney is trying to get away from the princess movie thing. Tangled is supposedly their last princess movie. That's one we really like. (I LOVE Mother Gothel's character.)
Post a Comment